I found quite a few V1 OE suction cups...large ones and small ones. I installed a couple of the small ones and can now get it to stick to the tape placed over the dot matrix. The suction isn't as good as the glass, but it does appear to be holding.
I tried scraping the black dots...no-go on my car.
ya you wont get caught claiming a new windshield on insurance they dont check if its pitted or theres a rock chip in your line of vision its a safety issue so tell them its bigger than a dollar size in your vision and dont let them send safelite they suck crap and there own glass i know the whole game and dont use xyg or fy crap glass only carlite for ford lof pilkington or ppg
![]()
there you go what else police cars ferrari's ppls heads slammed in the windshield with blood im good at that bb gun vandalism gunshots il post u name it
Last edited by glockboy20; 03-06-2009 at 04:33 PM.
^
Just do some searches using the search function here:
Per the likes of jimbonzzz, "The Professor," as well as Mike B. and MEM-TEK (anyone here can vouch for the validity of their information) this should not have any noticeable effects on RADAR detection capabilities (regardless of the "capabilities" or "how good" a detector is - as the ceramic material should not attenuate RADAR).
JBserrell on NASIOC - the North American Subaru Impreza Owners Club Forums, actually called this one in to Valentine Research ( REF: [ame=http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showpost.php?p=25550799&postcount=55]NASIOC - View Single Post - DIY V1 radar detector mount[/ame] ). He reported:
In that thread, however, one specific NASIOC member said that he saw an approx. 2-tenths of a mile decrease in detection range/distance, with his V1 mounted behind the dots, when tested versus a speed-drone.Called Valentine Research and they said that the black ceramic dots wold most certainly NOT effect radar performance at all.
I honestly don't know why he would've seen such a decrease - and he made several passes to confirm this.
My only thought was that perhaps the drone was going out of calibration or that an ancillary concern, such as other vehicles or passing objects triggering the speed-drone's output may be the issue (yet, that should have been "caught" by the fact that he repeated his runs so many times [and in terms of the reps, my question was how consistent was his data - if saw a large delta/error-bar, or was the performance *consistently* that much better? for if-inconsistent, I would worry that drift, or other external factors, was involved]).
And AFAIK, he's been the ONLY such reporting case......
Bookmarks