Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: POP - WHY not?

  1. #11
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    14,448

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by KnightHawk View Post
    B]In the training manual, speed readings alone taken by a speed detection device cannot stand up in court or is not used as a basis for citation[/B].
    While this is indeed true, I think way too many people use this as an erroneous reasoning for disabling their POP reception. Had you received those pop alerts, you would have slowed down before he tagged you with the I/O. It's incredibly foolish to turn POP off, even in Floridia.

    "Buy the BEST and screw the rest." - fire65

    "im intrested to see how well you do.i never seen a car JTG before would be a first for me.." - radarrob

  2. #12
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    My Home
    Posts
    3,169

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by Stealth Stalker View Post
    It's incredibly foolish to turn POP off, even in Floridia.
    All POP capable units from the manufacturer sent to Florida are disabled. Meaning, operational use of POP is zero.

  3. #13
    Power User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by Stealth Stalker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KnightHawk View Post
    B]In the training manual, speed readings alone taken by a speed detection device cannot stand up in court or is not used as a basis for citation[/b].
    While this is indeed true, I think way too many people use this as an erroneous reasoning for disabling their POP reception. Had you received those pop alerts, you would have slowed down before he tagged you with the I/O. It's incredibly foolish to turn POP off, even in Floridia.
    The other problem is that 16ms POP that's been around for well over a year remains completely undetectable (and don't tell me about STi point-blank shots, unless you show me a video of a cop duct-taped onto your hood)

  4. #14
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    14,448

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by KnightHawk View Post
    All POP capable units from the manufacturer sent to Florida are disabled. Meaning, operational use of POP is zero.
    Yeah, and cops never search or arrest anyone without a warrant or probable cause either.

    Not all radar units are ordered from the manufacturer.

    Trust me, there is POP in Floridia.

    "Buy the BEST and screw the rest." - fire65

    "im intrested to see how well you do.i never seen a car JTG before would be a first for me.." - radarrob

  5. #15
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    €pe
    Posts
    422

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Thanks a lot people! My mind is now by the brighter side of knowledge

  6. #16
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    My Home
    Posts
    3,169

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by jdong View Post
    The other problem is that 16ms POP that's been around for well over a year remains completely undetectable (and don't tell me about STi point-blank shots, unless you show me a video of a cop duct-taped onto your hood)
    Trust me bro, I know all about that. I've tested it near and far. It's plainly common sense to test your RD's capability at a distance and not point blank range. FYI, 16ms POP has been around for not just over a year but close to a decade now. To be exact, it came out in 1999.

  7. #17
    Power User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by KnightHawk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by jdong View Post
    The other problem is that 16ms POP that's been around for well over a year remains completely undetectable (and don't tell me about STi point-blank shots, unless you show me a video of a cop duct-taped onto your hood)
    Trust me bro, I know all about that. I've tested it near and far. It's plainly common sense to test your RD's capability at a distance and not point blank range. FYI, 16ms POP has been around for not just over a year but close to a decade now. To be exact, it came out in 1999.
    Yeah; you're right. Which begs the question: Why aren't they detecting it?

    Is it TRULY a technically challenging problem close to infeasibility, or is it because "We already have this thing that says K-band POP on the box, we can't add another bullet point if we implement this fancy feature."

  8. #18
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    352

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by View Post
    Why not to trust technology? Is it after all so reliable?
    You must be new to technology...

  9. #19
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    €pe
    Posts
    422

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    You must be new to technology...
    Yea, just dig out from the grave.

  10. #20
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,509

    Default Re: POP - WHY not?

    Quote Originally Posted by KnightHawk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by nr2d View Post
    What is the "warmup time" for the radar. I would think that it should take .5 to 1 sec for the radar's magnetron or TWT to stabilize. Unless speed radars are different from a normal "search" radar like on an airport. Besides being much lower in peak and average power they should work the same way, the magnetron or TWT is the oscillator.

    The only other thing I can think of is that the magnetron or TWT is on continuously and they are transmitting into a dummy load and the load is switched to the antenna via something like a Pin Diode switch.

    Just some thoughts.
    There is "no warm up" time. Radar is put on standby mode or put on hold. With instant on and when done properly, readings are instantaneous. Maybe jimbonzzz can explain it better. Just don't have much technical knowledge when it comes to this.
    It's a gunn oscillator. When it's in standby, the gunn oscillator isn't powered. They use a switching regulator to turn it on/off, at least in the POP units.

    As for "warm-up time". here is Valentine's take on why this can lead to inaccurate measurements:
    https://www.valentineone.com/pop/info.asp

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •