
Originally Posted by
Lucky225
A voir dire hearing would likely restrict any testimony/evidence of the fact that a seat belt was or was not worn before the jury even got a chance to hear it.
Regardless, a skilled lawyer can introduce restricted facts by manipulating testimony, which would only result in the jury being instructed to disregard and the Reporter ordered to strike it from the record. Documentation for jury inspection can also be skillfully manipulated to circumvent said restrictions. Logic assumes that it would weigh into deliberations regardless of any instructions to proceed otherwise.
Yesterday was a happy day as I finally received a copy of the lawyer's Demand for Settlement. It's at the high end of BASE naturally, but even if I were to recover in that amount it wouldn't be adequate compensation for all the misery the accident caused me.
Again, apologies....
[/HIJACK]
Bookmarks