You should ban youre friend his got A$$ on his name lol pathethic fool
Maybe one day you will attend and help us with your expertise[/quote]
He wants your a$$ Mike, watch out he may use...
Type: Posts; User: Golderon
You should ban youre friend his got A$$ on his name lol pathethic fool
Maybe one day you will attend and help us with your expertise[/quote]
He wants your a$$ Mike, watch out he may use...
Maybe one day you will attend and help us with your expertise[/quote]
He wants your a$$ Mike, watch out he may use is tiny radar on your a$$[/quote]
Keep starting crap and talking crap, and...
Maybe one day you will attend and help us with your expertise[/quote]
He wants your a$$ Mike, watch out he may use is tiny radar on your a$$
Man I know EXACTLY who you are. Stick to the other forum with your bickering. Dont try to ruin this one also.[/quote]
You're the one who is getting offended just because I said dont believe what...
Check this out what happy (from lidar) posted after i posted a thread regarding SOLO2 .
http://www.radardetector.net/Solo-2-Impressive-17821t.php
Happy go you're the one who is always starting...
Sorry for everyone, If you want to keep changing RD base on the test result go ahead..Peace
All I said dont believe what they tested, just do your own testing if its GOOD then keep it. Then he got offended by that..
We do tests out of passion. You are looking WAY too much into it.[/quote]
Yeah and you guys do what when ever someone beg the differ on your test?? making people think that they got a bad deal...
They did one for SOLO 2 on Uphill, he posted the result when I said I was impress with the SOLO 2.
I am not trying to start a crap, I'm just saying evrytime some put someting here and say they have good range and sensitivity, you guys always put up your result. NOT ALL RD (individual) ARE MADE THE...
I am not Electronics Guru but I do have a diploma in Electronics. IMO If you get a good RD with good range keep it. Not all Rd are made the same.
Electronics components, the way they were build...
They rated Solo 2 bad uphill then explain why I am getting good range and detection on my RD??????? IMO they want to show V1 is the best because they uses V1.. Blah
Last night was another encouter with pigs. Doing 85 on 65 when my SOLO 2 gave me a brief tone, then started getting stronger. I was looking at the opposite direction and i couldnt find a pig, 1 mile...
WTF, why would anyone sell V1 for $499 plus shipping (new) when I can get it for $ 400 at VR, are these people buying these are stupid??? WTF
I bought a $500 (cnd money ) RD and its worth more than my car :roll:
Make sure you test it . Ever thought they might have just put an older sw ver. and made it look like a new version so that they can fix the E prob temporary?
can u kindly pls tell me what is the minimum range can a pigs clocked you? I mean to get good reading? x, k, ka thanks
So its that means they using 34.7 Ghz where I live? Sorry I am not familiar with the Ka's frequencies.
I been using my Solo 2 for about 3 weeks now.. I am really impress of its performance. I usually use it on the highway and no false alarm whatsoever, and It hasnt failed me yet, everytime I get a Ka...
Yeah ur right, I guess it was just too excited to get one, I can believe i even went for it. I think I'll be better off buying a new one from VR.
Thanks.
I got outbidded on ebay for a V1 ver 1.7. I cant believe it went for $170 considering it has a cracked on the front antenna window. and it look really abused. serial number begins with 3... is that...
Hi, does 1.7 version detects Ka band?
Firefly 3 cylinders :P
or buy a SOLO 2 :) :P :P
Go ahead and get the X50 and check this self-calibration/service required poll:
http://www.radardetector.net/viewtopic.php?t=4391&highlight=self+cal
44% YES
54% NO
Wow, it looks like you...