New xtr-695

[BlinderGuy]

I just received my own xtr-695 and was driving around doing some testing and noticed it doesn't false on K-band doors as much as my 9500i does..Is this because of a problem or better filtering...It didn't even go crazy when pointed directly at the door like my 9500i did..Just wondering if I got a defect.

[Lucky225]

I just received my own xtr-695 and was driving around doing some testing and noticed it doesn't false on K-band doors as much as my 9500i does..Is this because of a problem or better filtering...It didn't even go crazy when pointed directly at the door like my 9500i did..Just wondering if I got a defect.

Sweet I wonder when I'll receive my new replacement

Edit: As for the falsing Whistler has some sort of technology to ignore door openers until they drift off frequency, it does excellent on REAL encounters though.

[guit123]

its pretty normal. my 690 does very well on real K police and thankfully keeps quiet on k doors.

[djrams80]

The Whistler is significantly less sensitive to K band than is the 9500i. There's probably more factors, but that's probably the biggest reason.

[Lucky225]

The Whistler is significantly less sensitive to K band than is the 9500i. There's probably more factors, but that's probably the biggest reason.

Perhaps, it still gives you way more then enough time on C/O K tho.

[BlinderGuy]

I hope it was not a waste of money! Even at the cost I get them for if it isn't good at detection it isn't worth the money.

[Regalized]

You can rest assured the 695 is a solid performer. I have a 9500ix and the 695 is always within a few seconds in alerting me compared to the 9500ix.

Its funny you mention k band sources. Because there is a k band speed sign near my house and the 695 alerts a good 75 feet before my 9500ix. Now there are trees all down the center of the median and I don't know if the 9500 has problems grabbing that signal until a certain point or what. All I know is the 695 does not.

For the money it can't be beat. I had a V1 and got rid of it. Detection was great but it ghosted like no other. Now I have the 9500ix and really like it as a whole.

And I can honestly say that with the 695 compared to the V1 and 9500ix, that I have been at no disadvanatge. No it does not alert as far out as the V1 or 9500IX in alot of instances but its always within a few seconds. And it still gives you ample time to slow down, unless its laser or i/o then all bets are off.

I think once you get some seat time with it you will love it considering how easy it is on the pocket book.

[Jag42]

I hope it was not a waste of money! Even at the cost I get them for if it isn't good at detection it isn't worth the money.

Its normal i have a 78 and it filters K band doors very well. Some K band are very weak. Stanley sensors are very nice. They are mostly being used ! Wal-mart has them. It does good detecting
K band as i had 3 saves in very hilly evil terrain in NM with C/O K with over a mile in detection.

[Whistler1]

Regalized,

My XTR695 always lags my RX65 and V995 by 4 to 5 seconds average on 3 K band speed signs. So your XTR695 may be hotter than mine.




Whistler1

[BlinderGuy]

Display sucks...Hard to see during daylight...Even on bright setting!!!!