Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    2,686

    Default whister 695 testing

    Ok I just got my 695 and did some tests. I used a known x band false and k band false, I don't have foot reading for the x band but I can estimate.

    X - band

    V1 - 750 ft

    955 - 200 ft

    695 - 200ft

    The 955 and 695 see equal on the x-band for sensativity.

    K-band -

    V1 - 1900 ft

    955 - 350 ft

    695 - 170 ft

    The 695 was a fairly poor performer on x band, the 955 easily beat it, while the V1 is king.

    I have not done any ka band testing because I don't have access to a ka gun. If someone wants to send me one for testing I can do that, and I'll even pay for return shipping. Other than that, it is what it is.

  2. #2
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    S State
    Posts
    1,092

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    i for sure know v1 picks door openers way better than whistler. not a big deal since whistler picks k cops at least a mile + in many of my encounters.

  3. #3
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    105

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    All you proved was that the 695 was better at filtering out X and K band falses.

    In that regard, looks like the V1 and 955 are poor performers.

  4. #4
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,881

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    Quote Originally Posted by Keto View Post
    All you proved was that the 695 was better at filtering out X and K band falses.

    In that regard, looks like the V1 and 955 are poor performers.

  5. #5
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    2,686

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    There should not have been any filtering, I was in highway mode with all of them and the filter on the 695 from what I know is used to filter out other detectors, like the junk feature on the valentine, at least that is what the manual says.

  6. #6
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lakeland,Fl
    Posts
    2,702

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    Quote Originally Posted by languy99 View Post
    there should not have been any filtering, i was in highway mode with all of them and the filter on the 695 from what i know is used to filter out other detectors, like the junk feature on the valentine, at least that is what the manual says.
    send it in!!!!

  7. #7
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    2,686

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    ok, i'll pm mike

  8. #8
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pensacola, Florida, United States
    Posts
    1,283

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    Quote Originally Posted by languy99 View Post
    There should not have been any filtering, I was in highway mode with all of them and the filter on the 695 from what I know is used to filter out other detectors, like the junk feature on the valentine, at least that is what the manual says.
    I think he was kidding, but just because it is in highway mode doesn't mean there is no filtering.

  9. #9

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    Exactly. Whistler's high end RDs have a sneaky built-in filtering algorith which cause them to ignore very weak pairs of K band signals which have very similar frequencies. This filtering algorithm correctly assumes that these weak signals are false alerts from K band door openers as long as their signal strengths are weak and of similar intensity. Its a slick little bit of code which helps to make Whistlers quieter when driving around town, and its why I tend to recommend Whistlers for people who do mostly city driving and who are on a tight budget. As far as I am aware, this filter is active even if a Whistler is in Highway mode, but I could be wrong.

  10. #10
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pensacola, Florida, United States
    Posts
    1,283

    Default Re: whister 695 testing

    Quote Originally Posted by MEM-TEK View Post
    Exactly. Whistler's high end RDs have a sneaky built-in filtering algorith which cause them to ignore very weak pairs of K band signals which have very similar frequencies. This filtering algorithm correctly assumes that these weak signals are false alerts from K band door openers as long as their signal strengths are weak and of similar intensity. Its a slick little bit of code which helps to make Whistlers quieter when driving around town, and its why I tend to recommend Whistlers for people who do mostly city driving and who are on a tight budget. As far as I am aware, this filter is active even if a Whistler is in Highway mode, but I could be wrong.
    Nope. You are right.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Whister Pro-3450 Remote Info
    By BingoPlayerz in forum Whistler
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-26-2010, 02:23 PM
  2. New Budget-Priced Whister
    By Veil Guy in forum Whistler
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 06:22 AM
  3. Comparing the Whister Pro68 to the Pro 78
    By Whistler1 in forum Whistler
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-15-2008, 03:17 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-05-2008, 01:09 AM
  5. Just got my Whister Pro 78 today...
    By rks in forum Whistler
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-01-2007, 09:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •