Apart Euro 550, what Bel would be good for Europe?

**jimbonzzz** · 04-15-2006, 08:55 PM

Originally Posted by Mariton

Thanks for your reply g-zona :wink:

To conclude, RX65 or 995 won't detect radars which work on Ku band at 13.45 GHZ ?
The Euro 550 is actually the only one which can radars on this Ku band used in Spain or in England ?

This was mentioned before. The 13.400 +/- 25 MHz is a misprint in the specifications on the website and elsewhere.

The RX-65 and V995 can detect Ku @ 13.45 GHz. We tested the RX-65 on 13.45 GHz at the Guys of LIDAR test.

**GeeM** · 04-16-2006, 06:02 AM

Good news

Thanks for your reply jimbonzzz :wink:

**nvr2fast** · 04-16-2006, 08:10 AM

Originally Posted by Mariton

Good news

Thanks for your reply jimbnzzz :wink:

Me edited too since u did hehe

**GeeM** · 04-16-2006, 09:28 AM

Oops

ops:
Message edited

**GeeM** · 04-16-2006, 08:55 PM

Hi guys!

You told me the Euro 550 is actually the best for Europe but it's a little old and I'm afraid that it might have bad detecting results

Do you think Euro 550 would be the best even if it is old or the RX65 Intl can be good because it's more recent (GOL tests show good results for RX65 which has Ku band

) ?
The price of the RX65 is also interesting so I am asking you...

Thanks :wink:

**amoney** · 04-16-2006, 09:02 PM

Dont be afraid with getting a tried and true proven unit like the target550. I have a 985 (made for north america) and I still use it and have not seen a great reason to upgrade to the rx65.

You however have those dam low power multinova's, and I would stick to the selectivity of the target550, rather that sweep the entire band wasting precious seconds.

**Dilip** · 04-17-2006, 01:25 AM

You should consider the Bel966R! But that needs to be mounted in your engine bay.

Your main issue is you need to know if they use multanova's in your country. If you do, then a RX65 would be useless. I think the 550 is your best bet!