Page 6 of 19 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 187
  1. #51
    ES13Raven
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Holla
    Still need to put up 3.861 numbers.....

    If we run the V-1 in U, it seems like it will give us better range---? or more falses?
    I thought the 3.861 was not used in the GOL test, only 3.858?

    And no, you don't want to use U or u mode - that is Euro mode. :shock:

  2. #52
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,483

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ES13Raven
    Quote Originally Posted by Holla
    Still need to put up 3.861 numbers.....

    If we run the V-1 in U, it seems like it will give us better range---? or more falses?
    I thought the 3.861 was not used in the GOL test, only 3.858?

    And no, you don't want to use U or u mode - that is Euro mode. :shock:
    Read the original first post. He states that 3.861 would also be tested. :wink:

  3. #53
    ES13Raven
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hookem202
    Read the original first post. He states that 3.861 would also be tested. :wink:
    I know, but the graph indicates GOL - like it was used in the GOL test.

  4. #54
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    335

    Default

    I've updated my post to reflect the latest numbers (added an STi).

    Pissing contest aside, yeah, the units technically should be -dB - and like Michael has explained, relative sensitivities are relative sensitivities regardless.

  5. #55
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    540

    Default

    What were the Belscort Rev #'s? I know they were the same ones in the GOL test but it doesn't list rev #'s.

  6. #56
    Founder of Stealthvation
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    11,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wanderingmind
    What were the Belscort Rev #'s? I know they were the same ones in the GOL test but it doesn't list rev #'s.
    A4M9 is the firm of the one that Veri just added. Also it is STI #3 in the GOL 07 results
    RIP Duncan my BELOVED black lab son 8/7/99-3/23/11. I will miss you DEARLY.


    http://www.criminalcustomzshop.com/


    LET THE BIRTH OF MANY TESTING GROUPS HAPPEN!











    You want to know what it is like doing something for the love and passion and not for the mighty dollar then look up GOL!










    buyradardetectors rocks!

  7. #57
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,483

    Default

    Was the Rx-65 put in USA MODE?

  8. #58
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hookem202
    Was the Rx-65 put in USA MODE?
    I don't think so. This was from some of Michael's testing that he did a long while ago.

  9. #59
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    540

    Default

    What rev was the X50?

  10. #60
    Founder of Stealthvation
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    11,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wanderingmind
    What rev was the X50?
    I beleive rev 5. It was Fakejamal's that was tested by Mike B
    RIP Duncan my BELOVED black lab son 8/7/99-3/23/11. I will miss you DEARLY.


    http://www.criminalcustomzshop.com/


    LET THE BIRTH OF MANY TESTING GROUPS HAPPEN!











    You want to know what it is like doing something for the love and passion and not for the mighty dollar then look up GOL!










    buyradardetectors rocks!

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Mike B's Sensitity Testing / WE need a UPdated test ! :)
    By Mandingo in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-13-2012, 04:15 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •