Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: STi PROBLEMS???

  1. #11
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,724

    Default

    X2

  2. #12
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    73

    Default

    What i meant is that Mike Valentine previously denounced the necessity of having POP detection on radar detectors.... But now, he changed his stance and now says its extremely usefull.. Thats why i was saying that he was similar to john kerry a couple years back.

    I was looking at detectors and read many reviews, many of which criticising the V1.. Placing the RX65 and the X50 above the STi...

    Furthermore, in a test with the STi vs the V1, the STi blew the V1 away....
    http://www.banned site.com
    Any opinion??

  3. #13
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooja3k
    What i meant is that Mike Valentine previously denounced the necessity of having POP detection on radar detectors.... But now, he changed his stance and now says its extremely usefull.. Thats why i was saying that he was similar to john kerry a couple years back.

    I was looking at detectors and read many reviews, many of which criticising the V1.. Placing the RX65 and the X50 above the STi...

    Furthermore, in a test with the STi vs the V1, the STi blew the V1 away....
    http://www.[banned site]/article.asp?articleid=100542

    Any opinion??
    You are talking about a site with RT in the name and that site is run by a dummy named CP. CP tried to sabotage the GOL testing because he knew the V1 would beat the STi. CP is a liar and he is paid by Escort and Bel to bash the V1 so he does that year after year.

    http://www.guysoflidar.com/march-2007/sabotage.html


    Why don't you look at unbiased results and tell me who won.

    http://www.guysoflidar.com/march-200...ctor-test.html

  4. #14
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Orange County
    Posts
    73

    Default

    WOW! I read that sabotage test before but I hadn't noticed the ATTN on the box...

    HAHA thats funny...

    Thank you!
    My opinion of the V1 has significantly improved.. Yet it still is significantly low on Ka 34.7Mhz... Is this a common type of Ka?

  5. #15
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,724

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ooja3k
    WOW! I read that sabotage test before but I hadn't noticed the ATTN on the box...

    HAHA thats funny...

    Thank you!
    My opinion of the V1 has significantly improved.. Yet it still is significantly low on Ka 34.7Mhz... Is this a common type of Ka?
    It looks like only Stalker makes 34.7 radar guns. Drive around and look for cops in your area and you can see what kind of equipment they use so that you can choose which detector fits your needs.

    From the GOL site:

    Ka Frequencies By Manufacturer (USA)

    MPH Industries 33.8 GHz
    Stalker Radar 34.7 GHz
    Kustom Signals 35.5 GHz
    Decatur Radar 35.5 GHz
    McCoy's Law Line 35.5 GHz

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 690 SE problems?
    By lookbutdonttouch in forum Whistler
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-23-2010, 10:10 PM
  2. 3.826 having problems
    By BullyDawg19 in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-08-2008, 08:57 AM
  3. How many have had Problems with there LI?
    By aj in forum Laser Interceptor
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 02-16-2008, 10:12 PM
  4. Car problems - please help
    By richardboy316 in forum Car Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-06-2006, 09:07 AM
  5. Problems with RD
    By vincecarterjr14 in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-29-2006, 09:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •