Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 9500i

  1. #1
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    147

    Default 9500i

    Anyone have any concerns regarding a possible reduction in response time to a threat with the 9500I having to sweep X, K, KA, KU, POP, SWS, LASER and now GPS Coordinates for marked locations and frequencies.

    Like most computers as hard drive space fills up, the slower your computer will work.

    How many marked locations can the chip store?
    And when will the quantity of marked locations cause a noticable lag in response time?

    Something to think about when you drive around marking every Bank, Convenience Store and SuperMarket.

  2. #2
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    117

    Default Re: 9500i

    Quote Originally Posted by Greg
    Anyone have any concerns regarding a possible reduction in response time to a threat with the 9500I having to sweep X, K, KA, KU, POP, SWS, LASER and now GPS Coordinates for marked locations and frequencies.
    I cannot give you a concrete answer for all of your questions. However, I believe that the top detectors all use DSP circitry, so no "sweeping" is done. Rather when the Detector recieves a radar signal it compares it's frequency with the known bands that the police use and acts acordingly. I am sure that someone else here can give you a more in depth explanation.

  3. #3
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    7,509

    Default

    With a few exceptions, "sweeping" is done in all modern day radar detectors....

    But I wouldn't worry much about response time. As a matter of fact, what limits response time in most detectors isn't caused by a slow sweep, but is actually done on purpose to reduce false alerts. The manufacturers use filtering algorithms which require that a signal be present for a certain amount of time in order to trigger an alert, commonly a few hundred milliseconds (except in some circumstances such as POP)...

  4. #4
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    My Home
    Posts
    3,169

    Default Re: 9500i

    [quote="Greg"]

    Like most computers as hard drive space fills up, the slower your computer will work.

    [/qoute]

    I don't know if the 9500i works like that but there's a possibility.


    How many marked locations can the chip store?
    Others have stated it can handle 5K locations - got no concrete evidence on that and the manual didn't even state that number. But let's just say 100 for example. That's a lot of locations. If the false alert is in an intersection and speeding is not a concern, putting it on A mode will do the job. But if you have to use the lockout feature, i don't really think that you will need 50 lockout areas on your daily commute. I drive an average of 130-150 miles a day and only lockout less than 10. Maybe more in heavily urban areas. But locking out 50 or more is a lot in my opinion.

    Note that SWS is not widely used as well as Ku band. POP can be turn off/on and i don't think this will delay the response time and in fact when POP is enabled, the 9500i is more sensitive to radar signals and you get a good amount of POP false alerts.. Also LEO won't waste his time doing rspeed checks in intersections and if he does, it will be very very slim for him to do that. Most citations we get is usually in the interstates, school zones, state hiways that have PSL from 45 - 70 . It's just a fact that we don't get speeding tickets in intersections.

    I would suggest that you try the 9500i yourself. You will have a 30 day trial and return it back if you don't like it. You won't really be able to know all the capabilities the 9500i will do unless you try it yourself. I may be able to tell you some of it but you won't enjoy it if you don't ride with it. :wink:

  5. #5
    Professional
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    974

    Default

    I am not worried about my 9500i slowing down. I defrag it once a week.



  6. #6
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    my 9500i has ZFS so no need to defrag. ntfs noobs. :shock:

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. My new 9500i vs pro 78
    By kuba in forum Whistler
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 07:05 AM
  2. zr3 with 9500i
    By GR34TN1NJ4 in forum Escort
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-19-2009, 09:49 AM
  3. Current 9500i More Sensitive than Early 9500i?
    By ZJamaican in forum Escort
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-20-2008, 04:00 AM
  4. 9500i from roy or 9500i from best buy
    By speedcrazy in forum Escort
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-07-2008, 05:40 PM
  5. V1 vs 9500i?
    By a529612 in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-17-2007, 04:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •