Got the Wrong Detector!

[Idontgo55]

Your 9500ix is no match for Tx Dps and there Quick trigger I/O tactics which i'm sure the ix is a poor performer. I live in Lubbock and Dps all around here will snatch you in a flash with 200ms of Instant on 34.7 Ka. Some cruisers are equipped with spectres. Belscorts have a very long response time to filter the radar. Dps can Q/T you with out your detector alerting.

you really want to bash a 500.00 ix when you have a pro 78???? Really? you're sure but you haven't used one????

Next you will say a Pro 78 out do a ix ........

[Jag42]

Your 9500ix is no match for Tx Dps and there Quick trigger I/O tactics which i'm sure the ix is a poor performer. I live in Lubbock and Dps all around here will snatch you in a flash with 200ms of Instant on 34.7 Ka. Some cruisers are equipped with spectres. Belscorts have a very long response time to filter the radar. Dps can Q/T you with out your detector alerting.

you really want to bash a 500.00 ix when you have a pro 78???? Really? you're sure but you haven't used one????

Next you will say a Pro 78 out do a ix ........

Dude we are talking about the response time !

V1- 100ms
Whistler-100ms
Escort- 500ms-800ms

Check the video forums on Q/T watch V1 and Whistler crush everything else.
http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...-qt-today.html

[Idontgo55]

Your 9500ix is no match for Tx Dps and there Quick trigger I/O tactics which i'm sure the ix is a poor performer. I live in Lubbock and Dps all around here will snatch you in a flash with 200ms of Instant on 34.7 Ka. Some cruisers are equipped with spectres. Belscorts have a very long response time to filter the radar. Dps can Q/T you with out your detector alerting.

you really want to bash a 500.00 ix when you have a pro 78???? Really? you're sure but you haven't used one????

Next you will say a Pro 78 out do a ix ........

Dude we are talking about the response time !

V1- 100ms
Whistler-100ms
Escort- 500ms-800ms

Check the video forums on Q/T watch V1 and Whistler crush everything else.
http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...-qt-today.html

You're a joke that's a bushnell radar and you're saying a pro 78 is much better then a ix?

As for range the ix will smoke a pro 78 My ix got beat by a whole 0.01 of a mile with a v1 I'll take over sound of it going off at anything and everything

[Jag42]

Your 9500ix is no match for Tx Dps and there Quick trigger I/O tactics which i'm sure the ix is a poor performer. I live in Lubbock and Dps all around here will snatch you in a flash with 200ms of Instant on 34.7 Ka. Some cruisers are equipped with spectres. Belscorts have a very long response time to filter the radar. Dps can Q/T you with out your detector alerting.

you really want to bash a 500.00 ix when you have a pro 78???? Really? you're sure but you haven't used one????

Next you will say a Pro 78 out do a ix ........

Dude we are talking about the response time !

V1- 100ms
Whistler-100ms
Escort- 500ms-800ms

Check the video forums on Q/T watch V1 and Whistler crush everything else.
http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...-qt-today.html

You're a joke that's a bushnell radar and you're saying a pro 78 is much better then a ix?

As for range the ix will smoke a pro 78 My ix got beat by a whole 0.01 of a mile with a v1 I'll take over sound of it going off at anything and everything

Again we are talking about reactivity not sensitivity. Whistler and V1 are the fastest RD's on the planet. Not even the redline nor a 1,600 can react as fast as these 2 companys. Its not just the Bushnell its all types of radar gun manufactures. DO YOUR RESEARCH !!

[CJR238]

Id rather be owned by QT than C/O.

[Idontgo55]

Your 9500ix is no match for Tx Dps and there Quick trigger I/O tactics which i'm sure the ix is a poor performer. I live in Lubbock and Dps all around here will snatch you in a flash with 200ms of Instant on 34.7 Ka. Some cruisers are equipped with spectres. Belscorts have a very long response time to filter the radar. Dps can Q/T you with out your detector alerting.

you really want to bash a 500.00 ix when you have a pro 78???? Really? you're sure but you haven't used one????

Next you will say a Pro 78 out do a ix ........

Dude we are talking about the response time !

V1- 100ms
Whistler-100ms
Escort- 500ms-800ms

Check the video forums on Q/T watch V1 and Whistler crush everything else.
http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...-qt-today.html

You're a joke that's a bushnell radar and you're saying a pro 78 is much better then a ix?

As for range the ix will smoke a pro 78 My ix got beat by a whole 0.01 of a mile with a v1 I'll take over sound of it going off at anything and everything

Again we are talking about reactivity not sensitivity. Whistler and V1 are the fastest RD's on the planet. Not even the redline nor a 1,600 can react as fast as these 2 companys. Its not just the Bushnell its all types of radar gun manufactures. DO YOUR RESEARCH !!

Ok have fun with a crappy 150$ rd and Ill get owned with QT NOT co like he said and you do your own RESEARCH

Id rather be owned by QT than C/O.

[Divewjason]

^There is nothing wrong with using an ix, but everyone here who reads in this forum should be aware of Escort's shortcomings to quick bursts of instant on. Given the right terrain Whistlers do provide great performance for $150 bucks. Whereas you get a lot of features and gps with the Escort 9500ix. Both are great detectors meant for different crowds, but because a detector without gps is cheaper than one with a gps does not make it suck.

That aside, remember that the 9500ix uses a detection platform that can be had for $150 bucks! The GPS is what makes the ix more expensive and it is up to the user to decide if it is worth the money.

[CJR238]

^There is nothing wrong with using an ix, but everyone here who reads in this forum should be aware of Escort's shortcomings to quick bursts of instant on. Given the right terrain Whistlers do provide great performance for $150 bucks. Whereas you get a lot of features and gps with the Escort 9500ix. Both are great detectors meant for different crowds, but because a detector without gps is cheaper than one with a gps does not make it suck.

That aside, remember that the 9500ix uses a detection platform that can be had for $150 bucks! The GPS is what makes the ix more expensive and it is up to the user to decide if it is worth the money.

Well said, however the 9500ix doesint use a detection platform that can be had for $150 bucks, more like $300. Its an excellent platform that's derived from one of the most advanced and is the bench mark for for all RD's available today.

[Idontgo55]

^There is nothing wrong with using an ix, but everyone here who reads in this forum should be aware of Escort's shortcomings to quick bursts of instant on. Given the right terrain Whistlers do provide great performance for $150 bucks. Whereas you get a lot of features and gps with the Escort 9500ix. Both are great detectors meant for different crowds, but because a detector without gps is cheaper than one with a gps does not make it suck.

That aside, remember that the 9500ix uses a detection platform that can be had for $150 bucks! The GPS is what makes the ix more expensive and it is up to the user to decide if it is worth the money.

Again this shows you know nothing to compare a 150 Rd to a 500 rd Yes it's for people who have the money to spend which are diff types of people the cost diff isn't just the GPS do you really think the 78 range is that of a ix?

[cooljay]

Again this shows you know nothing to compare a 150 Rd to a 500 rd Yes it's for people who have the money to spend which are diff types of people the cost diff isn't just the GPS do you really think the 78 range is that of a ix?

idontgo55 you fail at reading, you really do.

They ARE NOT comparing range.

They ARE comparing RESPONSE TIME.

Two completely different things here and it has been proven time and time again that the V1/Pro 78 RESPONSE TIME will pick up bursts of radar <300ms where as 9500ix etc. must see the signal for approximately 500ms BEFORE an alert will happen.

I put in bold the important words so you can better understand this post.

Once again comparing RESPONSE TIME and NOT range or sensitivity.