Stale website?

[Ven0mizer]

Anyone know why VR's website is so outdated? copyright 2005 on the bottom, still bragging about 2002 test results, etc? Are we experiencing Tupac moments with new V1 revisions getting released? I believe it is VITAL they update their site as people will look at the front of the detector and think "old", then look at all the material and test results, and just pass this off as an antique detector when it isn't....who else feels this way? What persuaded me to buy the STi at first was its stealth for one, but also all the posts about poor off axis blah blah blah on the V1, and looking at beltronics site is what sealed the deal, now I realize Beltronics was just a chocolate covered terd (is still mad at CS for slow processing and lying about the 33.8 issue)

[sethy]

In all fairness to VR still using the results of 2002- that was probably the last honest test that was done before results starting being bought.

Look at what the new tests are. X50 top dog, x50 worlds best- but yet, in our GOL tests, time and time over v1 is most sensitive out there.

[Ven0mizer]

In all fairness to VR still using the results of 2002- that was probably the last honest test that was done before results starting being bought.

Look at what the new tests are. X50 top dog, x50 worlds best- but yet, in our GOL tests, time and time over v1 is most sensitive out there.

Why doesn't he put GOL tests on the site? Well...I guess in fairness it would be like stealing GOL's work, or being afraid of people claiming "rookies" or whatever...but still, that's better than a five year old test :/