Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 50
  1. #21
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    just need something hat will wrk all the time no matter what. if im spending that money and it fails what would be the point.
    I'm a very pragmatic person when it comes to things like this - my point-of-view is that if you're a habitual speeder, you're going to get nailed, at some point, *no matter what*.

    The problem is that although today, LIDAR presents what may be the most significant threat, there's other stuff out there that's, again IMveryHO, even more "deadly" - I/O radar, VASCAR (airborne or roadway), and even the tried-and-true art of "pacing" - if you habitually speed, no matter how careful you are, you're bound to get nailed at one point or another.

    Just like modding cars, the old saying of "you've gotta pay to play" also applies here.

    I'm a firm believer of this.

    In any case, yes, the LI is considered top-of-the-line now, but even with its protection, you're still not totally immune. Those three enforcement scenario I addressed above are just a few of your concerns, and add to that you still have to deal with LIDAR scenarios that are simply just bad-luck. If, for example, your vehicle's positioning on the roadway somehow caused your jammers to not receive an incoming signal (i.e. nose-down attitude, while the engagement comes from, say, an overpass, at close-range), you'll still be in trouble.

    Nothing is for-certain - all you can do is just to do your best and pray, but expect the worst.

    --

    Note here also, since you've specifically mentioned "failure" - to be absolutely fair, the current-generation LI has not yet been on-market long enough to truly have compiled durability/reliability statistics. This is simply an unknown at this point, particularly when examined in-frame of the two other top-flight diode-based jammers, for which both have had enough of a track record for us to know what to expect.

    But just as fair, it must also be said that the LI units look, physically, first-hand, to be very durable - and it should also be said that they've enjoyed excellent durability/reliability in their previous-generation iterations overseas.

    Still, this cannot go unsaid.

    --

    does the LI have a off switch so when I do get hit and say I am going over. onces I bring my speed down I can turn it off so that theofficer does not get suspicious?
    Yes, the LI kit includes a power switch, with LED "power on" indicator, which also serves well as a night-time position/pilot marker for tactical disengagement.

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by interceptor
    Quote Originally Posted by IRCMUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by g-zona
    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    In honesty how well does the LI compare to the LPP.


    Also there is new Salker LZ1 algorithm and is also JTG!
    I got a question about those numbers

    1st the jammer heads were not all in the same spot they were all installed at the same time. With that said the installs of some heads had a more tactical advantage over the others. Crazyvolvorob showed me a picture of the m-40 install and it was a JOKE I am surprised at the numbers it got, I would have expected less.
    2nd the instant PT from the UL 100 PPS gun was before the LPP 100 PPS fix done
    But I am surprised at the over all performance of the LPP so like I said before $hitty install
    Or maybe they were using a Laser Defender… :wink:


    No offence Happy$$ and the rest of the crew but try to give them all a fair shake spend 3 days instead of 1 afternoon and put the dual head units all in the same place.
    To me this is a scientific experiment in an experiment you have to have control, which means you mount them ALL in the same spot.


    THIS IS BIG TIME BS !!!!!

    Jammers was instaled one at the time, exactly same place same bracket, on all instalations ware used bouble levels to make sure install is perfect..

    man you dont know what are you talking about...
    thats not the story i got

    are you sure you know what you are talking about?

  3. #23
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default

    ^ I wasn't there, and I also haven't talked to anyone who was - but from reading the GOL test, it seems that the jammer were placed in the same spots:

    The Blinder was tested with four transponders. The Escort Shifter ZR3 was tested with three transponders. All the rest of the jammers were tested with two transponders. To keep things consistent, all two-transponder jammers had the transponders mounted in the same locations.
    Emphasis added.

    Prior to that, however, it was said simply that:

    The jammers were mounted to provide the best performance, as determined by the Guys of LIDAR.
    I would imagine that the participants conferred gathered for consensus on head placement of the respective 4, 3, and 2-head setups, and then, as described in the paragraph which followed (cited first, here), each 2-head units were themselves placed in the same location as the other 2-head units.

    ...... also...I thought that Ivan (interceptor) was physically present during the testing?

    Not trying to start any trouble - just wanted to have this factor clarified as well.

    I was always under the impression that the LPP didn't perform as well simply due to the fact that its mounting positions on the test-vehicle, which was dictated by the need to replicate the mounting position of the other 2-jammer head systems, was just not optimal for it, and that's all.

  4. #24
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IRCMUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by interceptor
    Quote Originally Posted by IRCMUSA
    Quote Originally Posted by g-zona
    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    In honesty how well does the LI compare to the LPP.


    Also there is new Salker LZ1 algorithm and is also JTG!
    I got a question about those numbers

    1st the jammer heads were not all in the same spot they were all installed at the same time. With that said the installs of some heads had a more tactical advantage over the others. Crazyvolvorob showed me a picture of the m-40 install and it was a JOKE I am surprised at the numbers it got, I would have expected less.
    2nd the instant PT from the UL 100 PPS gun was before the LPP 100 PPS fix done
    But I am surprised at the over all performance of the LPP so like I said before $hitty install
    Or maybe they were using a Laser Defender… :wink:


    No offence Happy$$ and the rest of the crew but try to give them all a fair shake spend 3 days instead of 1 afternoon and put the dual head units all in the same place.
    To me this is a scientific experiment in an experiment you have to have control, which means you mount them ALL in the same spot.


    THIS IS BIG TIME BS !!!!!

    Jammers was instaled one at the time, exactly same place same bracket, on all instalations ware used bouble levels to make sure install is perfect..

    man you dont know what are you talking about...
    thats not the story i got

    are you sure you know what you are talking about?

    yes, i know what i am talking about, i was there unlike u...

  5. #25
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    JTGville, USA
    Posts
    1,500

    Default Re: Jammer for a neon?

    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    Well my thing is i have a neon srt4, im looking for front and read cover. My idea is to get 2 heads for front and one for rear, how does that sound????
    It really seems like you made this topic just to tell everyone you have a SRT-4. :roll:

  6. #26
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    512

    Default Re: Jammer for a neon?

    Quote Originally Posted by noTe
    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    Well my thing is i have a neon srt4, im looking for front and read cover. My idea is to get 2 heads for front and one for rear, how does that sound????
    It really seems like you made this topic just to tell everyone you have a SRT-4. :roll:
    and i have SRT8 :-) this is like dual head setup..: :-) LOL

  7. #27
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    466

    Default Re: Jammer for a neon?

    Quote Originally Posted by noTe
    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    Well my thing is i have a neon srt4, im looking for front and read cover. My idea is to get 2 heads for front and one for rear, how does that sound????
    It really seems like you made this topic just to tell everyone you have a SRT-4. :roll:
    if that is the case then seems like everyone in the jammer forums just wants to telle veryone what car they have cause like people before me topics are "what jammer for CLK" hmm, showing off a little?

    I just simply want to know what works best and what works for my car. Maybe someone has a neon and has the system that works well for them

  8. #28
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    466

    Default

    interceptor, i tried contacting you and no response..??

  9. #29
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    JTGville, USA
    Posts
    1,500

    Default Re: Jammer for a neon?

    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    Quote Originally Posted by noTe
    Quote Originally Posted by muledoe1
    Well my thing is i have a neon srt4, im looking for front and read cover. My idea is to get 2 heads for front and one for rear, how does that sound????
    It really seems like you made this topic just to tell everyone you have a SRT-4. :roll:
    I just simply want to know what works best and what works for my car. Maybe someone has a neon and has the system that works well for them
    It doesn't matter what TYPE of car you have. You should read more topics here before even making this topic.

    The only thing you should be asking is where to put the sensors. Certain jammers don't do better or worse on certain cars. Just buy the best jammer and ask the best place the mount it.

    Now if you have a RV or some gigantic vehicle that you are using a jammer on, that's when you would ask if you need more than two sensors. Other than that, this entire topic is a waste of time.

  10. #30
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    466

    Default

    well then WHERE should i put them on my srt4

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. It's a lot easier installing a CB in a neon...
    By srtga in forum Scanners, Ham Radios, & CB's
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 12-14-2009, 09:16 AM
  2. de-srt'ing my neon...
    By srtga in forum Car Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-18-2009, 02:26 PM
  3. Neon and Laser
    By Orbital75 in forum Escort
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-03-2007, 01:32 PM
  4. Laser can False on RED NEON!!!
    By Ford_Focus_05 in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-09-2005, 07:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •